The Ngram shows that in American English used to not occurred less than 50 % as usually as did not use(d) to in 2008, and its use has become steadily declining.
It can be most likely declined even more than the chart indicates, since many of the more latest circumstances will be citing earlier texts. And if you Examine US/United kingdom utilization in that hyperlink you'll see used of
without the need to be explicit. And when context is misleading and you should be express, say "A or B, or the two".
I used to be used to travelling on your own, so having my whole spouse and children along has become a large adjustment for me to make.
I'm possessing problems Googling a reference due to "of", but it's a standard phrase - not weak crafting in the least. Possibly a little aged-fashioned. It might also mean "used by" - there is certainly an outdated hymn Used of God - but that's a different phrase.
3 It seems odd to me that "used she to return below?" is marked as formal (old-fashioned and awkward I concur with). The "used to" construction registers with me as currently being fundamentally casual. In a proper context I might assume "did she formerly arrive below?" or Several other wordier phrase. (AmE speaker)
If a "that" is omitted, It really is the first a single that is taken out. Changing the second "that" with "it" might explain items:
two Ben Lee illustrates two important points: "on" is yet another preposition for identifying location, and idiom trumps sense, with sometimes-alternating in's and on's cascading ever closer into the focal point.
The exact same conduct may possibly occur with the additional "that" appearing in the sentence. So while it'd be suitable in concept, Maybe you may reword your sentence this kind of that it results in being more readable on your audience.
is awful English. It should be averted, and folks who use it click here should be made entertaining of. It exists mainly because there are actually 3 ways to utilize the words and phrases and
I wasn't used to driving an enormous automobile. (= Driving a huge car was a new and difficult experience – I hadn't finished it right before.)
is compactness within the focus on space needed for existence for extending constant function from dense subspace?
is really a gentle feeling of contrast or indifference: "Assistance you to your cakes, the pies, plus the tarts" as opposed to "Aid your self to the cakes, the pies, or maybe the tarts."
Now we try out our nifty trick of dropping one of many "that"s — "I don't Assume that problem is major" —, and we immediately get a certain amount of people who parse the sentence as "[I do not Believe that] [problem is major]" on their initially attempt, and get terribly confused, and have to return and try a different parsing. (Is that a backyard garden-path sentence however?)